olivia rodrigo birth chart Contact me. Specifically, defendant contends that his trial counsel failed to effectively present his motion to suppress; failed to effectively argue the applicable law regarding accountability; successfully obtained the admission into evidence of the extrajudicial statement of Sheila Daniels; and refused to permit him to testify at trial. 356, 547 N.E.2d 523 (1989), and People v. Nicholls, 42 Ill.2d 91, 245 N.E.2d 771 (1969), ruled that defendant's confession was voluntary. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. If a court of review has decided a legal issue then the successor judge may rely upon that ruling as settled law, and, in the absence of a change in the law by a still higher court, or new factual basis, apply it to the case before him or her. That fact alone distinguishes defendant's case from the Greenspawn case where the X-ray technician had testified as to the authenticity of the X-rays. McCoy was found shot to death on November 13, 1988 in the back seat of his Cadillac, which was parked in a Southside Chicago alley. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. 69, 538 N.E.2d 444. In support of those motions, defendant alleged that the police had lacked probable cause to arrest him, that he was not advised of his constitutional rights at any time subsequent to his arrest, that his admissions were involuntary and the result of police coercion, and that Sheila had acted as an agent of the police. Judge Toomin then cited several cases supporting his holding and found that defendant's testimony was incredible. She was born to a Chicago city bus driver mother Nadine Brewer and businessman father David Ray McCoy. About 30 minutes later, she accompanied police to Tyrone's home, where he was arrested and taken to the police station. The appellate court held that the trial court had a duty to reconsider its ruling after the appellate court found the ruling as to one statement was erroneous. 592, 610 N.E.2d 16. Defendant next argues that his counsel erred in successfully obtaining the admission of Sheila Daniel's statement into evidence. At the police station, defendant was questioned regarding McCoy's death and admitted to having purchased the gun used in the shooting, but stated it had been stolen by her brother Anthony Daniels. 300, 631 N.E.2d 303 (1994). 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the defendant was granted a new trial, where he again moved to suppress statements, arguing now that he could prove other suspects had also been tortured at Area 2. The trial court found that the defendant waived the issue of his allegedly coerced confession by failing to raise it on direct appeal. of first-degree murder against Sheila Daniels, 41, late Monday . A trial court retains jurisdiction to reconsider an order it has entered, even after remand, as long as the cause is pending before the trial court. Consequently, we find that defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of trial counsel by his counsel's failure to present the argument that defendant was psychologically influenced by his sister. A proper foundation is necessary for the admission of hospital records. In an amended postconviction petition, the defendant argued the existence of new evidence, that being the OPS report, warranted a hearing on his petition. At the time, he was also in the police station and was bleeding after having been beaten by police. The Williams court stated: [N]one of our Taylor line of cases limited the Taylor rule only to those subsidiary issues that may actually have been considered by a judge whose appealable order a judge of coordinate authority later undertakes to modify. Sheila Daniels and her brother Tyrone killed David Ray Mccoy, who had been dating her for ten years. The State appealed the suppression order, but only challenged the standard that the trial court applied. Putting aside the fact that this claim is nothing more than mere speculation on defendant's part and ignores all of the evidence presented by the State in support of her conviction, the fact remains that a proper foundation was not laid for admission of the records into evidence. His lover, Sheila Daniels, and her brother, Tyrone, were found guilty of his murder. There are various reports of the motive behind McCoy's murder. In a motion to cite additional authority filed after oral arguments were heard in this case, defendant cited the recent holding in People v. Jones, 315 Ill.App.3d 500, 504, 248 Ill.Dec. 2052, 2064, 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693; People v. Albanese (1984), 104 Ill.2d 504, 85 Ill.Dec. IV. 604], 645 N.E.2d 856, 864 (1994). at 467, 133 L.Ed.2d at 396. 18-2(a)), and concealment of a homicidal death (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. During its deliberations, the jury sent a note to the trial court asking if plaintiff's medical records pertaining to the 1980 beating were available to the jury. 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.1(a)(4), (a)(8) (West 1996). On November 4, 1988, after receiving reports of an abandoned car blocking an alley, police discovered the body of David Ray McCoy, lying face up with three gunshot wounds to the head, in the back seat of his car. Following a jury trial in 1990 before Judge Michael P. Toomin, defendant Sheila Daniels was convicted of the first degree murder of her paraplegic boyfriend, David McCoy, and was sentenced to an 80-year prison term. He initially told the police that he did not know anything about the death of McCoy. In general, under the law of the case doctrine, a rule established as controlling in a particular case will continue to be the law of the case, provided the facts remain the same. Rumor has it that David's death was caused by a disagreement over a high power bill. Shortly after arriving at the police station, the detectives confronted defendant with the fact that she owned the gun. A woman twice convicted for the 1988 murder of South Side entrepreneur David Ray McCoy was sentenced Tuesday to 80 years in prison. However, she did not attempt to call Tyrone at the hearing on her motion. 2052, 2068, 80 L.Ed.2d 674.) (See People v. Majer (1985), 131 Ill.App.3d 80, 86 Ill.Dec. The court continued: As to the right to counsel, it is, of course, the State's burden to establish the voluntariness and this essentially refines itself to issues of credibility in this case. 1827, 1838, 144 L.Ed.2d 35, 53 (1999). People v. Daniels, 272 Ill.App.3d 325, 208 Ill.Dec. People v. Enis, 163 Ill.2d 367, 386 [206 Ill.Dec. In response, the City moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that the materials requested were irrelevant and confidential and that the subpoenas were the result of speculative fishing expeditions. Alternatively, the City requested an in camera inspection of the documents and the issuance of a protective order in the event the subpoenas were not quashed. 38, par. Further, after being at the station for two hours, She was not allowed to use the phone despite her numerous requests to call both Vrdolyak and her sister. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 333, 208 Ill.Dec. In addition to what he had told Cummings, defendant told her that Sheila and McCoy had been arguing when Sheila accidentally shot McCoy. She said, I told them what happened and just tell them what happened, tell them the truth." If this court did not previously consider a legal issue, and rule upon it, there can be no law of the case which successor Judge Urso should have heeded. (Emphasis in original.). His girlfriend and her brother were the ones convicted of the murder. In support, he attached to his petition an affidavit from an Illinois attorney, reports from OPS detailing the abuse at Area 2, findings from the Chicago police board regarding Area 2 and his own affidavit in which he asserted that he was beaten, pistol-whipped, shocked and suffocated. 321, 696 N.E.2d 313. Categories . In connection with the motion to suppress, defendant filed two subpoenas duces tecum upon the City, requesting, inter alia, the production of all documents relating to disciplinary complaints against any of the officers at Area 2 who were expected to be called as witnesses at her trial. There, our supreme court reversed the defendant's murder conviction based on the prosecutor's improper cross-examination. 1 On appeal, with one justice dissenting, this court ruled, inter alia, that the trial court did not err in denying defendant's Jack O'Malley, State's Atty., County of Cook, Chicago (Renee Goldfarb, Margaret J. Faustmann and Clare T. McEnery, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee. See Supreme Court Rule 413(c) (134 Ill.2d R. 413(c)) (requiring that the State be informed of, and permitted to inspect and copy or photograph, any reports or results, or testimony relative thereto, of physical or mental examinations ***.). Defendant then took the gun away from his sister and put it in his pocket. David was killed by his then-long-term girlfriend, Sheila Daniels, and her brother. In arguing that his trial counsel misapprehended the accountability law, however, defendant distorts the record and fails to mention any of his trial counsel's attempts to show that defendant in no manner participated in the planning or commission of the shooting of McCoy. container: 'taboola-right-rail-thumbnails', After defendant told police where Anthony lived, he was picked up and taken to the police station. 312, 556 N.E.2d 1214. 594, 789 N.E.2d 768) and reconsider our decision in light of the holdings in People v. Crespo, 203 Ill.2d 335, 273 Ill.Dec. She also stated that Anthony had been beaten by the police in an attempt by the officers to frighten, intimidate and otherwise coerce [her] into making admissions to the crime charged. Defendant again sought a hearing on her motion to suppress. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png. After the trial court denied defendant's amended motion to quash arrest and suppress statements, she was granted leave to file an amended motion to suppress statements. People v. Enis, 163 Ill.2d 367, 387, 206 Ill.Dec. She also asserted that incriminating statements she had given investigators were made in the absence of Miranda warnings and resulted from prolonged questioning and refusals by police to allow her to contact her attorney and family, which was a violation of her fifth and sixth amendment rights. In denying defendant's request for a hearing on her motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence, Judge Urso stated that the issues raised in the motion were properly litigated at the trial level and ruled upon by the appellate court. Judge Urso found that there was no new evidence nor were there exceptional circumstances warranting a hearing on the motion. Sheila then entered the interrogation room and, after hugging defendant, told him loudly "to do whatever they say to do, we was (sic) gone (sic) go home and everything was gone (sic) be all right." The subpoenas also sought official police photographs of all officers on duty at Area 2 during the time she was interrogated in connection with McCoy's murder. Based on that statement, she considered him to be her attorney. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 332, 208 Ill.Dec. Another was where the defendant had been acquitted of some charges, thereby precluding him from seeking appellate review of the trial court's rulings. In Crespo, the defendant stabbed the victim 24 times with an eight-inch knife and pulled her hair with such force that part of her scalp was torn from her head. Also, at no time did Judge Toomin state that he was denying the motion to suppress based upon the opinions of police officers who questioned defendant as to their belief regarding whether defendant was in custody.. 2052, 2066, 80 L.Ed.2d 674.) memorial page for David Ray McCoy (6 Mar 1935-13 Nov 1988), Find a Grave Memorial ID 52651554, citing Cedar Park Cemetery, Calumet Park . 767, 650 N.E.2d 224. In her motion to suppress filed before her first trial and in the first motion to suppress filed with Judge Urso, defendant said nothing about Anthony's beaten condition as being a reason for her inculpatory statements. Defendant said he understood those rights and agreed to give a statement to the State's Attorney, which was subsequently transcribed. 528, 589 N.E.2d 928. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm defendant's conviction, vacate her sentence and remand for resentencing. She argues section 5-5-3.2(b)(2) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(b)(2) (West 1996)), which allowed the trial court to impose an extended sentence based upon his finding that the murder was accompanied by exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior, should have been decided by a jury, rather than the trial court. As to the scope of the subpoenas, the defendant in Hinton sought only the complaints of excessive force made against the detectives who were identified in the defendant's case. 1526, 128 L.Ed.2d 293 (1994). According to Cummings, defendant stated that Sheila Daniels shot McCoy in the back of his head while McCoy was seated in his car in his garage. Justice DiVITO delivered the opinion of the court: After a bench trial, defendant Tyrone Daniels was found guilty of first degree murder (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, 71, 356 N.E.2d 71 (1976). According to Cummings, defendant stated that Sheila Daniels shot McCoy in the back of his head while McCoy was seated in his car in his garage. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). 1000, 688 N.E.2d 693 (1997), the defendant was arrested in 1983 and taken to Area 2 where, after being interrogated, he admitted to his involvement in the murder under investigation. This court also rejected the State's argument that because the first trial judge did not address the issues of attenuation or independent basis, the second trial judge was not precluded from considering these issues. Hobley I, 159 Ill.2d at 312, 202 Ill.Dec. Dowery was killed in the same house where Daniels allegedly shot her former live-in boyfriend, David Ray McCoy, on Nov. 12, 1988, during an argument over a high electricity bill and who. The second trial court denied this petition but did hold an independent basis hearing for the suppressed in-court identification. They reportedly then drove McCoys body in his Cadillac to the alley and left him thereso sad. 698, 557 N.E.2d 468.) Defendant has cited no authority in support of this claim and it is therefore waived. However, during an episode of Lisa Rayesprior reality show,she cried uncontrollably as she and her daughter visited her dads grave site. Defendant makes much about the fact that the jury wanted to review the medical records, arguing that because the jurors were denied access to the records, they probably believed defendant was lying about the beating and therefore, convicted her for that reason. 721, 399 N.E.2d 1010); however, in this case, trial counsel presented what amounted to the most viable basis to support the motion to suppress. target_type: 'mix' However, this court, presented as it is with a record containing no support for defendant's assertion, must resolve the question against him. The trial court disagreed and dismissed the petition. Moreover, the record is devoid of any evidence demonstrating that defendant's statement was involuntary due to his emotional condition. Initially, defendant's case is not before us on a federal habeas review, and we therefore find application of the Court's holding in Thompson limited. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 333, 208 Ill.Dec. Constitutionality of extended term sentence. Screen Printing and Embroidery for clothing and accessories, as well as Technical Screenprinting, Overlays, and Labels for industrial and commercial applications Thompson, 516 U.S. at 116, 116 S.Ct. Her second trial, held in August before Cook County Criminal Court Judge Joseph Urso, ended in the same verdict. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago. There are various reports of the motive behind McCoy's murder. In so ruling, the Court stated that the ultimate determination for whether a defendant is in custody for Miranda purposes involved [t]wo discrete inquiries ***: first, what were the circumstances surrounding the interrogation; and second, given those circumstances, would a reasonable person have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave. Thompson, 516 U.S. at 112, 116 S.Ct. This court recently addressed this issue. 604, 645 N.E.2d 856 (1994). Thus, it is the position of *** defendant that the only law of the case in this case is the law pronounced by this court in its opinion in [Daniels I]. When he asked who it was, the police identified themselves and told him to open the door and let them in. He testified that the gun found near McCoy's body was eventually traced to Sheila Daniels, who, when questioned by the police, told them that defendant had killed McCoy; later, she led the police to defendant's apartment. Defendant agreed, and while accompanied by three officers, arrived at the police station around 5:30 p.m. that day. Defendant did not ask the trial court to consider Tyrone's testimony at his motion to suppress in ruling on her motion to suppress. 688], 721 N.E.2d 1219, 1221 (1999), [judgment vacated by People v. Huff, 195 Ill.2d 87 [253 Ill.Dec. Anthony was bruised and bloody, apparently as a result of having been beaten. Defense counsel's use of Sheila's statement was thus further support for counsel's arguments that defendant was not accountable for Sheila's actions. In fact, the section of Cleary and Graham relating to the admission of medical and hospital records explains that while the requirement of calling all persons who made the entries to testify has virtually disappeared with respect to the admission of business records, it continues to be applied to medical records. In determining that the defendant had failed to show that the sentencing error in his case was prejudicial, the court in Crespo held: we have no doubt that a jury, presented with these facts, would have found that the crime was committed in a brutal and heinous manner, indicative of wanton cruelty. Crespo, 203 Ill.2d at 348-49, 273 Ill.Dec. Prior to his trial, the defendant filed a motion to suppress claiming statements he had given police were the result of police torture. He was found shot to death in the back seat of his Cadillac, which was parked in a Southside Chicago alley. mode: 'thumbnails-rr1', McCoys then 32 year old live-in girlfriend of 10 years, Sheila Daniels, and her then 20 year old brother, Tyrone, were convicted of McCoys murder in 1990. She asked to call Vrdolyak during the polygraph exam. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion. 321, 696 N.E.2d 313 (1998) (Hobley II). In the instant case, defendant maintains that he probably would not have been convicted had his attorney properly argued and presented his motion to suppress. According to Chicago Tribune, three of McCoys other daughters, Jehlan, Morgan, and Cynthia, believe Daniels killed their father because she found out he was about to cut her out of his will. (1) On appeal, with one justice dissenting, this court ruled, inter . (Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690, 104 S.Ct. 9-3.1(a)); he was subsequently sentenced to concurrent terms of 60 years' imprisonment for first degree murder, 20 years for armed robbery, and five years for concealment of a homicidal death. In People v. Cannon, 293 Ill.App.3d 634, 227 Ill.Dec. In Crespo, our supreme court determined that sentences which violate Apprendi are reviewed under a plain error analysis when the defendant failed to object to the sentence in the circuit court. On November 12th, 1988, David Ray McCoy (shown above with Lisa Raye) was discovered shot to death in the back seat of his Cadillac in a Southside Chicago alley. Choices which are made on the basis of strategic considerations after a thorough investigation of all matters relevant to plausible options have traditionally been considered to be unchallengeable. 498, 563 N.E.2d 385. This court first looked to the holdings in People v. Hobley, 159 Ill.2d 272, 202 Ill.Dec. Tyrone DANIELS, Defendant-Appellant. The court then denied defendant's motion to suppress her oral and written statements. This new evidence consisted of a report from OPS and transcripts of testimony from other alleged victims of abuse. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago. Although the OPS report citing police misconduct at Area 2 has been brought to light since the time defendant and her brothers were questioned there, that does not alter the fact that defendant did not raise the issue of police brutality as a basis for suppression until years later. Shortly thereafter, defendant was interviewed by an assistant State's Attorney, who advised him of his rights. Likewise, during closing argument, defense counsel argued that nothing in defendant's statements indicated that he had any knowledge of Sheila's intent to shoot McCoy or in any way "aided, assisted, abetted, or [was] otherwise involved in this.". (People v. Dredge (1986), 148 Ill.App.3d 911, 913, 102 Ill.Dec. Therefore, based upon the facts before us, we find that Judge Urso did not err in refusing to grant defendant a second hearing on her motion to suppress based upon new evidence. Defendant contends on appeal that he was deprived of effective assistance of trial counsel. Defense counsel specifically asked Detective Cummings whether there was "anything in any of Mr. Daniels' statements that would lead you to believe that Tyrone Daniels did anything to aid, assist or participate with Sheila Daniels in any way until after Sheila Daniels had shot Mr. McCoy," to which Cummings answered, "No." Defendant also argues that the trial court erred in failing to allow her to reopen her case in light of the testimony Tyrone and Anthony would present at a hearing on her motion to suppress. Before trial, counsel for defendant filed several motions to suppress statements made by defendant after his arrest and to suppress evidence the police recovered in defendant's apartment. Defendant eloquently states her position in her reply brief, where she explains that in her view: [T]he [law of the case] doctrine applies not to motions' as such, but, rather, to legal issues determined almost invariably after a hearing. The record reflects that he testified that he had been struck, but he also testified that he did not make his statement because of this mistreatment, he made it because defendant told him to cooperate. Defendant was clearly aware that she had seen Tyrone and he had been injured. When the police arrived at defendant's apartment, Cummings and several other officers knocked on defendant's door and identified themselves. Defendant next contends that his trial counsel erroneously misapprehended the applicable law on accountability. She further alleged that prior to seeing her brother Anthony in a beaten condition, police had threatened to charge her and/or Anthony with McCoy's murder for which they could receive the death penalty. When asked on direct whether the records reflect and relate to the injuries that [defendant had] already testified [she] sustained in the incident with Ray McCoy, defendant responded, Yes.. 185, 786 N.E.2d 1019], quoting Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 18, 119 S.Ct. Shortly thereafter, one of the police officers punched him in his stomach and grabbed him by his hair, knocking his head into the wall. 1, 670 N.E.2d 679 (1996), the defendant similarly alleged that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his postconviction petition because of newly discovered evidence regarding Area 2 which disclosed a pattern of brutality directed at suspects in custody. Defendant's statement, taken by the court reporter and given to Democopoulos, was then entered into evidence over defense counsel's continuing objection to the admission of defendant's statements to the police. 552, 500 N.E.2d 445.) After hearing argument on the City's motion, the trial court quashed defendant's subpoena seeking photographs of the officers assigned to Area 2 at the time she was questioned there. David was found dead in 1988 in the back seat of his car. After learning she had failed the exam, she implicated her brother Tyrone in McCoy's murder. A South Side woman has been convicted for the second time of killing millionaire David Ray McCoy, her live-in boyfriend, in 1988. The testimony presented established that Sheila Daniels and her daughter lived with McCoy. The court found that there was no evidence that the defendant had sustained injuries consistent with his claim of police brutality. His conviction and sentence were affirmed in People v. Daniels, 230 Ill.App.3d 527, 172 Ill.Dec. One such circumstance was where the defendant's conviction was reversed and remanded for a new trial where the State failed to call a material witness at the hearing on the defendant's motion to suppress statements. Nowhere does the record indicate that defendant was somehow controlled or dominated by his sister or that he would abide by her wishes to his own detriment. Please try again. See People v. Golden, 342 Ill.App.3d 820, 277 Ill.Dec. As for Anthony, the police picked him up after defendant falsely implicated him as being involved in the homicide. Thereafter, the assistant State's Attorney spoke with defendant and advised him of his rights. It is improper for the jury to take items with them to the jury room during deliberations which have not been admitted into evidence. Tyrone did not testify at defendant's motion to suppress. 1, 670 N.E.2d 679. Rather, the only evidence presented that defendant acquiesced to his sister's will was his statement that he took her advice to "tell the truth.". 9-1(a)), armed robbery (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. After defendant let the officers into his apartment, the police asked him his name and, when he answered, they placed him under arrest, advising him of his constitutional rights. Similarly, in Hinton, this court rejected the defendant's argument that the postconviction court erred in quashing his subpoenas requesting any complaints involving excessive force against the officers identified in the defendant's case. Published by at February 16, 2022. In particular, she contested his determinations that she had voluntarily accompanied police to the station from her home on November 17, 1988, that she had not been tricked by police into accompanying them and that her statement to the polygraph operator was sufficient to establish probable cause for her arrest. After a discussion of the evidence and the applicable case law, which consisted almost entirely of defendant's arguments based on the fourth amendment, we held, Accordingly, we find that the circuit court properly denied her motion to suppress. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 336, 208 Ill.Dec. After reciting the testimony at the hearing, we concluded as follows: Defendant's motion to suppress was denied. In Thurow, our supreme court held that, in those cases where the defendant did object to his sentence in the circuit court, the reviewing court should apply a harmless error analysis: Is it clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the defendant guilty absent the error. Thurow, 203 Ill.2d at 368-69 [272 Ill.Dec. 38, par. We have vacated our prior opinion in a separate order and we determine that our prior decision to vacate the defendant's extended-term sentence was proper. *, concur. New theories supporting suppression do not constitute additional evidence that has become available since the first hearing to suppress. Hattery, 183 Ill.App.3d at 805-06, 132 Ill.Dec. The morning she testified at her trial, defendant went to the hospital and obtained the records relating to the beating. McCoy, 53, a self-made millionaire and bon vivant, was found dead in the back seat of his black Cadillac on Nov. 12, 1988. He was 53 years old. The court ordered an in camera inspection of records naming officers in relevant police reports, who had complaints of physical abuse or civil lawsuits for abuse filed against them. People v. Patterson, 154 Ill.2d 414, 489, 182 Ill.Dec. During the trial, the court was presented with transcripts of testimony from several witnesses in Sheila Daniels' jury trial. Make an enquiry and our team will be get in touch with you ASAP. Finding that the circumstances surrounding the commission of the murder were brutal and heinous, Judge Urso sentenced defendant to an extended term of 80 years in prison. Accordingly, we find that defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel due to his attorney successfully obtaining the admission of Sheila's statement. what happened to marko ramius; a bittersweet life full movie eng sub kissasian After discussing the fourth amendment issue, Judge Toomin continued: The other ground that the court notes from the motion is centered in both the 5th and 6th Amendments alleging a denial of her right to have an opportunity to consult with counsel, coupled with repeated questioning of her over a long period of time during which she was allegedly held incommunicad [o] *** and also that her will was overborne and she was impliedly coerced by the detective involved here., After a very lengthy recitation of defendant's testimony at the evidentiary hearing, Judge Toomin specifically said that defendant testified she was questioned repeatedly, though she asked to call Edward Vrdolyak [sic] who she considered to be her attorney.. A woman twice convicted for the 1988 murder of South Side entrepreneur David Ray McCoy was sentenced Tuesday to 80 years in prison. Consequently, we affirm our prior order vacating defendant's extended-term sentence and remanding this case to the trial court for resentencing. A South Side woman has been convicted for the second time of killing millionaire David Ray McCoy, her live-in boyfriend, in 1988. After the defense rested, the State objected to the admission of the medical records into evidence, on the ground that a proper foundation had not been laid.
Kanawha County Dui Checkpoints Tonight, West Haven Funeral Home Obituaries, Flexible Filament Not Extruding, Pine County Jail Roster Pdf, Border Patrol Hiring Process Forum 2020, Articles D